[Scorecard] [scorecard] Meetings: Oct 3 & Oct 6

[Caitlin Cornwall]

Peter,

I think I was the source of the confusion, and I apologize. You're  
right, consumption and groundwater demand were dropped. I think it  
would be a good idea to talk about them, however, to convey why they  
were not used.

Caitlin


On Sep 24, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Peter Vorster wrote:

I cannot make Oct 3 because I am committed to be at a meeting in  
Visalia for the San Joaquin River settlement implementation and am  
the only member of the environmental plaintiffs coalition attending  
along with 25 Bureau of Reclamation and Friant water district managers.

I am still confused about what indicators we are actually writing up  
and presenting.  I thought the consumption and groundwater demand  
indicators were dropped because the data was not there.  Are we still  
doing a write-up as a recommended indicator?

Looks like my indicator— water use— will be on Monday Oct 6, which I  
can make.  Could Water self-sufficiency be on Monday (perhaps swap it  
with Dry season flow) since I have been helping Rainer on that one  
and I thought the Water use and Water self-sufficiency were grouped  
together under a Stewardship Index.

Can the most recent agreed upon list of quantified and non-quantified  
indicators be circulated.  I am still plugging away on the Water Use  
indicator and will get it to the group soon.

Peter
On 9/24/08 11:04 AM, "Frances Knapczyk" <Frances at naparcd.org> wrote:

> Hi team,
>
> Mark your calendars for 2 phone meetings:
>
> Fri Oct 3, 2 – 3.30 pm
> Mon Oct 6, 2 – 3.30 pm
>
> The objectives of these meetings are 1) peer review the indicator  
> analysis and scoring and 2) bring ourselves up to speed on the  
> latest draft of indicators, how they were chosen, and how they were  
> scored.
>
> I propose that we cover Surface Storage, Groundwater, Water  
> Retention, and Water self-sufficiency on Friday,
> Cumulative flow, Dry season flow, and Water Use on Monday.
>
> Indicator leads should prepare 5-10 minute presentations of their  
> analysis, results, and conclusion.  You may wish to prepare a few  
> powerpoint slides to illustrate key results.  Please send these to  
> the team at least one day prior to the meeting so that there is  
> time for review. Please use figures that you’ve already prepared  
> for the tech. report.
>
> The conference call-in number will be sent soon.
>
> Thanks-
>
> Frances Knapczyk
> Education Coordinator
> Napa County Resource Conservation District
> 1303 Jefferson Street Suite 500B
> Napa, CA 94559
> 707/252-4188 x 120
> frances at naparcd.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scorecard mailing list
> Scorecard at sonomacreek.net
> http://sonomacreek.net/mailman/listinfo/scorecard_sonomacreek.net


-- 
Peter Vorster
Hydrologist
The Bay Institute
Home Office
3901 Balfour Ave
Oakland, CA 94610
510-444-5755 Voice/Fax
415-272-4209  Cell
vorster at bay.org

_______________________________________________
Scorecard mailing list
Scorecard at sonomacreek.net
http://sonomacreek.net/mailman/listinfo/scorecard_sonomacreek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sonomacreek.net/pipermail/scorecard_sonomacreek.net/attachments/20080924/bb00a8db/attachment.html