[Scorecard] meeting notes

Alex Young alex at sonomaecologycenter.org
Tue Oct 7 17:13:48 MDT 2008


Scores should be based on average of most recent 4 years of data 

I am on board with the most recent 4 years being the scoring period but I
don't think we came up with a justification for why we used 4 years.

 

Any thoughts?

 

Alex

 

  _____  

From: scorecard-bounces at sonomacreek.net
[mailto:scorecard-bounces at sonomacreek.net] On Behalf Of Frances Knapczyk
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:45 AM
To: scorecard at sonomacreek.net
Subject: [Scorecard] meeting notes

 

Hi Team,

Here are notes from our last two meetings. I probably missed some comments
(esp. regarding dry reaches), so please send revisions to me, and I will
recirculate notes to the team. 

Team decisions are in bold font.  

 

Second drafts of your writing assignments are due on Oct 15.  Please
incorporate comments from the meetings into the second drafts.  When should
we circulate drafts for outside review?

 

Thanks for your hard work!

 

Frances Knapczyk

Education Coordinator

Napa County Resource Conservation District

1303 Jefferson Street Suite 500B

Napa, CA 94559

707/252-4188 x 120

frances at naparcd.org

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sonomacreek.net/pipermail/scorecard_sonomacreek.net/attachments/20081007/7ce05b63/attachment.html>


More information about the Scorecard mailing list