[Scorecard] meeting notes
Alex Young
alex at sonomaecologycenter.org
Tue Oct 7 17:13:48 MDT 2008
Scores should be based on average of most recent 4 years of data
I am on board with the most recent 4 years being the scoring period but I
don't think we came up with a justification for why we used 4 years.
Any thoughts?
Alex
_____
From: scorecard-bounces at sonomacreek.net
[mailto:scorecard-bounces at sonomacreek.net] On Behalf Of Frances Knapczyk
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:45 AM
To: scorecard at sonomacreek.net
Subject: [Scorecard] meeting notes
Hi Team,
Here are notes from our last two meetings. I probably missed some comments
(esp. regarding dry reaches), so please send revisions to me, and I will
recirculate notes to the team.
Team decisions are in bold font.
Second drafts of your writing assignments are due on Oct 15. Please
incorporate comments from the meetings into the second drafts. When should
we circulate drafts for outside review?
Thanks for your hard work!
Frances Knapczyk
Education Coordinator
Napa County Resource Conservation District
1303 Jefferson Street Suite 500B
Napa, CA 94559
707/252-4188 x 120
frances at naparcd.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sonomacreek.net/pipermail/scorecard_sonomacreek.net/attachments/20081007/7ce05b63/attachment.html>
More information about the Scorecard
mailing list