[Scorecard] Agenda & materials for dec 4 meeting

[Caitlin Cornwall]

Sorry, folks, we got a tad behind. Will be communicating fully this  
afternoon.
Caitlin

On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Bob Zlomke wrote:

I was wondering about this too.  I thought we were getting an updated  
list of assignments.
And are we getting something soon on the formatting of data &  
metadata to be submitted to Pat?

Bob


From: scorecard-bounces at sonomacreek.net [mailto:scorecard- 
bounces at sonomacreek.net] On Behalf Of Peter Vorster
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:28 PM
To: Frances Knapczyk; scorecard at sonomacreek.net
Subject: Re: [Scorecard] Agenda & materials for dec 4 meeting

Did something get sent out detailing the calendar and assignments  
from the Dec 4 meeting.  I fear that my filters sometimes take out  
valuable e-mails.

peter

On 12/3/08 3:48 PM, "Frances Knapczyk" <Frances at naparcd.org> wrote:

Hi all,
Please find materials for tomorrow’s meeting attached to this email:  
Agenda (also see below), revised summary of comments, revised table  
of indicator status, 2 tech reports, template to fill in at  
tomorrow’s meeting.
--The revised summary of comments and table of indicator status are  
updates of the files I sent before Thanksgiving.  The changes are  
small but important.
--Filling in the attached templates will take up the bulk of  
tomorrow’s meeting.

Please bring copies of technical report & template to meeting.


Agenda for technical team meeting
Dec 4, 1:30 – 4:30
Sonoma Ecology Center Watershed Station

1.     Review agenda items and timing. 5 minutes.
2.     Calendar. 10 minutes.
a.     By Dec 19: technical authors submit template sheet, compare 5-  
versus 3-increment scoring.
b.     By Dec 15: technical authors submit draft data and metadata to  
Pat Stiefer at SEC.
c.      By Dec 31: Document editors revise and submit to funder the  
draft technical reports, scorecards, scorecard reports, data and  
metadata.
d.     By Jan 9: technical authors submit revisions of their sections.
e.     By Jan 23: peer reviews complete.
f.       Jan 27: last team meeting. More assignments likely.
g.     By Feb 20: last opportunity for input from technical authors.
h.     By Feb 28: document editors submit to funder the final  
technical reports, scorecards, scorecard reports, data and metadata.
3.     Recent decisions. 45 minutes.
a.     Scorecard structure.
b.     Scoring on an annual basis.
c.      Need to estimate uncertainty/variance. Lisa.
d.     Need to clarify logic process. “Topic sentences.”
e.     Explore 3-increment scoring.
f.       Need to make assumptions and hypotheses explicit.
g.     Need to link indicators to other indicators and to conceptual  
model.
h.     Try to include low flow.
4.     Work through template sheet for indicators (attached),  
starting with simpler indicators. 1 hour, 45 minutes.
5.     Assign peer reviews. 15 minutes.


Frances Knapczyk
Education Coordinator
Napa County Resource Conservation District
1303 Jefferson Street Suite 500B
Napa, CA 94559
707/252-4188 x 120
frances at naparcd.org


_______________________________________________
Scorecard mailing list
Scorecard at sonomacreek.net
http://sonomacreek.net/mailman/listinfo/scorecard_sonomacreek.net


-- 
Peter Vorster
Hydrologist
The Bay Institute
Home Office
3901 Balfour Ave
Oakland, CA 94610
510-444-5755 Voice/Fax
415-272-4209  Cell
vorster at bay.org

_______________________________________________
Scorecard mailing list
Scorecard at sonomacreek.net
http://sonomacreek.net/mailman/listinfo/scorecard_sonomacreek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sonomacreek.net/pipermail/scorecard_sonomacreek.net/attachments/20081211/975de7a3/attachment.html>